Audit My Trades See the full auditShare my audit cardDownload PDF Audit another file

This is a sample built from made-up trades. Audit your own file →

Audit My Trades · sample_tradebook.csv · free report

You are ahead, but the evidence of an edge is weak

Over 135 trades (2025-06-13 to 2026-10-15) you kept ₹63,920 after ₹70,467 in estimated charges. The biggest leak below cost you ₹1,60,241.

The gain is small against the swings from trade to trade. A run like this turns up by chance often enough that it proves little yet.

The test behind it: the gains are too uneven to separate from luck (steadiness 0.64 per day; 1.5 is the least that counts as moderate evidence).

Money result+₹63,920kept, after ₹70,467 of estimated charges
Evidence of an edgeWeaksteadiness 0.64 from 112 results, once the market's move is taken out
Recent confirmationNot confirmedtrades after 2026-06-11: fail; last 12 months positive

Read it top to bottom: the verdict, then the fixes worth the most money, then where the money went. Everything after that is the detail behind those.

61of 100
Your trading score medium confidence · 112 separate results
Edge46
Discipline99
Risk control46
Costs38
Consistency75
Sizing & holds75

Weakest: Costs. Every lost point, with its reason and rupees, is in the full audit.

Net P&L
+₹63,920
after ₹70,467 of estimated charges
On capital
+15.8 %
+11.7 % a year; worst fall -15 % of ₹4,05,429 (peak margin)
Evidence of an edge
Weak
how steady the gains are: 0.64, where 2 counts as strong evidence
Trading days
112
135 trades, 2025-06-13 to 2026-10-15
Last 12 months
+0.106 %
79 days, steadiness 0.94

If you had no edge at all, a per-day gain this large would still turn up by chance more often than not. Take out what NIFTY did while each trade was open and the same trades average +0.127 % per day.

The whole book as one: 135 trades on 59 symbols (56 long, 79 short), Futures. Read from a broker tradebook. Each strategy is also graded on its own further down.

Charges are estimated: each trade's own turnover at today's statutory rates (2026-10 (STT per Budget 2026, eff 1-Apr-2026)) plus the brokerage you set, no slippage added since your fills already carry it. Your broker's contract notes are the actual figure; if the file carries them, the audit uses those instead.

Fix these first

The rupee figures on these cards overlap: one trade can sit in a losing name, a big-loss day and the charges at once. They are the size of each leak, not savings that add up.

1

Ten trades are 43 % of all your losses-₹1.60 L

Your ten worst trades lost ₹1,60,241 of the ₹3,69,336 lost in all. The three worst: 2026-06-24 HDFCBANK26JUNFUT Futures, same-day, short, morning (09:45-12:00) (-₹31,785); 2025-11-12 HDFCBANK25NOVFUT Futures, same-day, long, morning (09:45-12:00) (-₹16,189); 2025-07-25 RELIANCE25JULFUT Futures, same-day, short, morning (09:45-12:00) (-₹16,002).

Next: Read these ten before anything else. What they share -- a name, a strategy, a hold, a size, a day -- is your first rule; the rest of the book is noise next to them.

2

3 days cost you 20 % of all your losses-₹75 k

A typical losing day costs ₹5,989; these lost at least three times that: 2026-06-24 (-₹31,785); 2025-11-12 (-₹23,995); 2026-07-28 (-₹18,830).

Next: The book is decided on a handful of days. A daily loss limit at about twice the typical losing day would have cut these; test it on the next month before trusting it.

3

Costs take 52 % of what you make-₹70 k

Each trade makes +0.168 % before costs and pays 0.063 % in charges and slippage. If your real fills are a little worse than modelled -- twice the costs -- the average day loses money (-0.005 %).

Next: A trade should make at least two to three times its cost. Check the brokerage you entered, and if your fills are worse than the default slippage, believe the doubled-costs line. The fix is more profit per trade, not more trades: every extra trade pays the same charges.

6 more findings in the full audit

Your biggest trades lose · Futures, same-day, short, morning (09:45-12:00) cost you ₹8,429 on 58 trades, won 60 % · Not enough trades yet to tell · Futures, same-day, long, morning (09:45-12:00) loses while the rest carry the book · The drawdown was 15 % of capital · Expect a losing run of at least 6 trades.

Where your money went

Made before costs+₹1,34,386
Charges (estimated)-₹70,467
Kept+₹63,920
Deepest fall from a high-₹62,7242025-11-25

Costs ate 52 % of the gross profit.

Month by month

2025-06: +₹22 kJun 252025-07: -₹12 k2025-08: +₹4738Aug 252025-09: -₹38842025-10: -₹1512Oct 252025-11: -₹48 k-₹48 k2025-12: +₹16 kDec 252026-01: +₹40372026-02: +₹37 kFeb 262026-03: +₹19862026-04: +₹1860Apr 262026-05: +₹44 k+₹44 k2026-06: -₹30 kJun 262026-07: +₹28 k2026-08: -₹32 kAug 262026-09: +₹38 k2026-10: -₹7449-₹7449Oct 26

Running total

2025-06-13 2026-10-15 +₹63,920

what you had kept, by exit day how far below your best point you were

More numbers
Average winner / loser+₹5,627 / -₹6,368
Profit factor (rupees won per rupee lost)1.17
Average trade+₹473
Longest losing run6 trades
Best / worst trade+₹29,711 / -₹31,785

In the full audit

Free during early access.

How this was read

How this was read

  • broker tradebook: 247 fills matched FIFO per instrument into 135 round trips
  • no strategy column: trades were grouped into 4 trade types by segment, hold, side and entry time (fewer than 8 trades folded into 'other'); name your own strategies in the report to grade each one
  • costs in rupees from each trade's own turnover: statutory stack (2026-10 (STT per Budget 2026, eff 1-Apr-2026)) + brokerage Rs 20 per order + GST; no slippage added -- real fills carry it in the price
  • MARKET-NEUTRAL: each trade minus the NIFTY move over its hold, signed for its side (a same-day trade uses the previous close -> close, a proxy for an intraday window)
  • MARGIN per trade = Stock futures 20.0 % of turnover (echoing the measured fractions behind this audit) -- ASSUMED; your broker's margin statement is the truth

Not checked here

  • Whether the rules used any information that was not available at the moment of the trade (look-ahead). Only you can confirm this.
  • Whether these exact trades were chosen after trying many variants. A strategy picked as the best of 50 needs a far higher bar.
  • Fills: limit orders that would not have filled, circuit limits, and impact on thin names are not modelled beyond the slippage line.
  • Margin, leverage and position sizing: returns are per trade on its own turnover.